2006 February

February 2006


I would like to take this opportunity to respond to the recent news articles about the MetroAccess paratransit service and MV Transportation, Inc., specifically focusing on the story “Study Raps Metro on Service for the Disabled” that appeared in the February 15 edition of the Washington Post.

While the story mainly focuses on the way in which WMATA operates MetroAccess and the findings of a study by the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board, several points related to MV Transportation need to be clarified.

The Washington Post continues to bring up MetroAccess, with a new story here entitled “Study Hits Metro on Service for Disabled“. We have to agree with most of the recommendations and observations of the study, in particular the lack of communication by MetroAccess.

We note with ironic amusement the end of the article:

In response to the huge number of complaints, Metro set up a weekly telephone conference to enable riders to speak directly with MetroAccess officials.

But Metro has not publicized the telephone number because managers are worried that the phone system would be overwhelmed, Metro spokeswoman Candace Smith said.

The type of dedication and commitment to service demonstrated by MV Transportation on Sunday is the type of good news that never makes it into the Washington Post, but we wanted to share the news directly with the riders and readers of DC Paratransit Info website.

Realizing that Saturday night’s snowfall would impact the service delivery of MetroAcess, MV Transportation took several steps to ensure that people who depend on MetroAccess would get where they needed to go.

One of WMATA’s common responses to criticism recently has been to claim that they are providing “shared rides”.  DC ParaTransit Info performed a small experiment today to test that concept out.

Pat and Kathi are both MetroAccess users, and both use powered wheelchairs.  Two separate trips were booked for today, leaving Pat’s work in Rockville Maryland at the same time, going to the same destination near College Park Maryland (home).  A PCA was booked as travelling with Kathi.

WMATA has posted a “Straight Scoop” article rebutting the news article published in the Washington Post on February 13th 2006.  Unfortunately, it seems to be little more than WMATA taking advantage of another opportunity to make subtle digs at the community.

Once more, WMATA seems to be attempting to portray the issues surrounding MetroAccess as being blown out of proportion, being mis-represented by the riders, and that the ridership is angry because we’re being somehow denied perks of some description, with comments such as these:

As followup to a recent user comment posted to this site, DC ParaTransit Info contacted the office of DC Councilmember Carol Schwartz (R-At Large) asking for more information regarding recent media reports of her looking into the MetroAccess issues in her capacity as Chair of the District’s Committee on Public Works and the Environment.  We received the following response to our inquiry today:

The Post has sallied forth on MetroAccess again today, at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/12/AR2006021201185.html. The article makes an interesting point, that there’s been over 2,400 complaints registered about MetroAccess so far since MV took over the contract.

Given the doubts we’ve raised about WMATA’s method of tabulating the number of complaints received recently, we wonder how reliable this figure is.

On the subject of which though, we have a question for the Washington Post itself. The article states:

But some riders said in interviews that they have been unable to log complaints and don’t trust MV’s statistics.

WMATA has announced that due to the snow, MetroAccess service has been suspended.  Candace Smith, a Public Affairs Officer for WMATA, said on Channel 9 WUSA TV this morning that this affects around 1,800 riders today.

This was confirmed on WMATA’s web site:

MetroAccess service has been suspended for Sunday due to hazardous road conditions, cold temperatures, and snow accumulation in excess of 8 inches. Our call center remains open for reservations and general questions. MetroAccess customers should call (301) 562-5360 for more information.

The editorial in the Post today at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/09/AR2006020901920.html is, as far as we know, the first media shot across the bows of MetroAccess.

The question still remains - why is any of this even necessary?

We have two professional transportation companies, who have many years of experience in moving people relatively seamlessly from point A to point B, who seem to be completely helpless to do so when it comes to a thousand people a day.

The editorial notes quite accurately that

Running this kind of program properly is neither easy nor inexpensive, but fixing phones, providing directions for drivers and improving pickup policies is elementary management.

Whilst reading WMATA’s old press releases earlier, we came across something interesting in one dated December 28th 2005, under the subject of “What’s in store for Metro in 2006?“.  The section that caught our eye is towards the bottom, in “2006 MetroAccess Highlights”:

A free trip voucher will be provided to any Metroaccess passenger who has experienced a missed or excessively late trip.

We’ve asked MetroAccess for clarification of this, specifically:

  • What constitutes an “Excessively late trip”?
  • Who decides if a trip is “Excessively late”?
  • Who issues such a voucher?

« Previous PageNext Page »

Bad Behavior has blocked 748 access attempts in the last 7 days.